Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 17, 2026
Pages: 1131 - 1138
Professional paper
Geodesy Editor: Mladen Amovic
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 1
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.06.2026. Professional paper Geodesy Editor: Mladen Amovic

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MLS-BASED URBAN TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING

By
Slavica Putnik Orcid logo ,
Slavica Putnik
Contact Slavica Putnik

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University Novi Sad , Subotica , Serbia

Bogdan Bojović Orcid logo ,
Bogdan Bojović

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University Novi Sad , Subotica , Serbia

Miroslav Kuburić Orcid logo ,
Miroslav Kuburić

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University Novi Sad , Subotica , Serbia

Jelena Tatalović
Jelena Tatalović

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University Novi Sad , Subotica , Serbia

Abstract

Although Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) has significantly enhanced the efficiency of urban topographic mapping, its performance in dense urban environments remains subject to multiple operational constraints. This paper examines key factors affecting data reliability, including GNSS signal degradation, IMU drift, occlusions, and point density variability, and analyzes their influence on point cloud integrity and the accuracy of the resulting digital topographic plan. Positioning accuracy may reach approximately 2–3 cm under favorable conditions, but can degrade to decimeter-level deviations in dense urban environments due to signal instability and trajectory uncertainties. Methodological considerations are proposed to improve robustness and quality control in MLS-based urban mapping.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.