Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 17, 2026
Pages: 899 - 906
Preliminary report/Short communication
Civil Engineering Editor: Anđelko Cumbo
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 1
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.06.2026. Preliminary report/Short communication Civil Engineering Editor: Anđelko Cumbo

MULTI-CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY SELECTION USING A HYBRID AHP-GA MODEL

By
Željko Marinković Orcid logo ,
Željko Marinković
Contact Željko Marinković

University of Belgrade - Faculty of Civil Engineering , Belgrade , Serbia

Nikola Knezevic Orcid logo ,
Nikola Knezevic
Contact Nikola Knezevic

University of Belgrade - Faculty of Civil Engineering , Belgrade , Serbia

Predrag Petronijević Orcid logo ,
Predrag Petronijević
Contact Predrag Petronijević

University of Belgrade - Faculty of Civil Engineering , Belgrade , Serbia

Nataša Praščević
Nataša Praščević
Contact Nataša Praščević

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid model integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Genetic Algorithms (GA) to optimize construction machinery selection based on cost, CO2 emissions, maintenance, and age. AHP was used to determine precise weighting criteria, while a Python-based GA explored the solution space using technical penalty functions. Results demonstrate the model's efficiency in balancing fleet performance and costs. The proposed model enables unbiased decision-making, significantly reducing subjectivity in engineering judgment and providing an objective framework for sustainable resource management.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.