Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 13, 2018
Pages: 369 - 385
Research paper
Architecture
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 435
PDF Downloads: 751
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.12.2017. Research paper Architecture

THE STUDY OF PARTICULARITY OF BANJA LUKA WATERFRONT IN VIEW OF DEFINING THE COURSE OF ITS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

By
Malina Čvoro
Malina Čvoro
Abstract

This Study examines the phenomenon of the relationship between the river as a naturalelement and the urban environment as a human creation.Their mutual relationship isobserved through the topics which are related to the spatial - programmatic, perceptual,aesthetic and cultural potentials that largely determine the identity of the place. Theexample of the city of Banja Luka has been analyzed and presented from the point of viewof several criteria: positioning of the urban structure with relation to the river,morphological and topographic characteristics, development level of the physical structureof the waterfront, accessibility, distribution of contents and heritage. The Study gives anoverview of the results of the survey conducted among the users of the space with regardto the identity, importance and the way of using the waterfront area. The values whichthose specific urban areas may contain have been identified in order to formulate certainrecommendations intended to improve the waterfront.

References

[1]
M. Samić, *Francuski putnici u Bosni i Hercegovini na pragu 19. stoljeća i njihove misli o njoj*. 1966, p. 208.
[2]
E. Vaništa-Lazarević, “Regeneracija priobalja – Ugledanje na svetske primere,” in *Book of Proceedings, 1st Symposium on Waterfronts in the Danube Region*, 2006, pp. 53–60.
[3]
J. Gehl, *Life between buildings: Using public space*. 1986, pp. 12–13.
[4]
M. Čvoro, *Transformacija priobalja u funkciji unapređenja identiteta gradova Republike Srpske i BiH* (Doktorska disertacija. 2015.
[5]
“*Zakon o kulturnim dobrima*,” 1995.
[6]
“*Prostorni plan Republike Srpske do 2015,” 2008.
[7]
L. J. Vujković and L. J. Došenović, *Dizajn vrta*. 2014, p. 34.
[8]
*Regulacioni plan za uređenje obala Vrbasa u Banjoj Luci*. 2010.
[9]
S. Husedžinović, *Dokumenti opstanka*. 2005, pp. 190–194.
[10]
“*Hidrološko-morfološka analiza rijeke Vrbas na području grada Banjaluke*,” 2008.
[11]
J. Cvijić, *Geomorfologija 2*. 1926.
[12]
A. F. Giljferding, *Putovanje po Hercegovini, Bosni i Staroj Srbiji – drugo izmenjeno izdanje*. 1996, p. 242.
[13]
H. Renner, “*Durch Bosnien und die Herzegovina kreuz und quer,” in Wanderungen*, 1896, p. 427.
[14]
L. J. Ševo, “*Urbanistički razvoj Banje Luke*,” pp. 62–63, 1996.
[15]
*Regulacioni plan za uređenje obala Vrbasa u Banjoj Luci*. 2010, pp. 13–18.
[16]
R. Radović, *Forma grada – Osnove, teorija i praksa*. 2003, p. 39.
[17]
J. Owen, “The water’s edge: The space between buildings and water,” in *Urban waterside regeneration: Problems and prospects*, 1993.
[18]
B. Hoyle, “Water transport and urban development: Some geographical perspectives and propositions,” *GeoJournal*, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 439–448, 1993.
[19]
R. Trancik, *Finding lost space*. 1986, p. 105.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.