Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 17, 2026
Pages: 517 - 537
Preliminary report/Short communication
Architecture Editor: Darija Gajić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 1
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.06.2026. Preliminary report/Short communication Architecture Editor: Darija Gajić

EVALUATING STUDENT CREATIVE COLLECTIVES IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION: A MIXED-EVIDENCE CASE STUDY OF APLExMANIA TEAMS

By
Diana Stupar Orcid logo ,
Diana Stupar

Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dajana Papaz Orcid logo ,
Dajana Papaz
Contact Dajana Papaz

Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Aleksandar Marić
Aleksandar Marić

Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This study examines student creative collectives as semi-professional formations linking architectural education and practice, focusing on micro-level team dynamics. Four APLExMANIA teams are evaluated across four domains: group formation, extra-curricular learning, visibility networks, and latent capacity. Using a joint display approach, the research integrates team self-assessments, mentor observations, and artefact analysis. Differences between self-reported and observed data emerge as key diagnostic indicators, revealing patterns such as crisis-driven learning and “punctuated gathering,” a discontinuous but persistent rhythm of collaboration. The findings suggest that pedagogical infrastructures can effectively support collaborative capacity, but through multiple models of cohesion instead of a single developmental trajectory.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.