Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 585 - 597
Research paper
Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 154
PDF Downloads: 115
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Research paper Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević

TESTING METHODS WITH DIFFERENT DEGREES OF SAMPLING IN DETERMINING SYSTEMATIC INFLUENCES AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES OF LINEAR MEASURING DEVICES

By
Miljana Todorović Drakul Orcid logo ,
Miljana Todorović Drakul
Contact Miljana Todorović Drakul

Geodesy and geoinformatics , Faculty of Civil Engineering in Belgrade, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Sanja Grekulović ,
Sanja Grekulović

Geodesy and geoinformatics , Faculty of Civil Engineering in Belgrade, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Dušan Petković ,
Dušan Petković

Geodesy and geoinformatics , Faculty of Civil Engineering in Belgrade, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Oleg Odalović
Oleg Odalović

Geodesy and geoinformatics , Faculty of Civil Engineering in Belgrade, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

This work tested several procedures to determine the linear measuring device's systematic influences and measurement uncertainty. Three methods were developed that differ in the degree and density of sampling during measurement and were compared with the existing method used for calibrating linear measuring devices in the Metrology Laboratory accredited for calibrating angle and length, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, in Belgrade. The goal is to determine the possibility of introducing these methods into the calibration process without violating the accuracy and precision measures and to meet the assumed measurement uncertainty requirements of measuring devices and equipment.

References

1.
ML160.RU-5. 2017.
2.
Mrkic R. Geodetic metrology. 1991.
3.
Činklović N. Analysis and preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of precise geodetic measurement methods. 1976.
4.
European Accreditation Laboratory Committee EA 4/02 M. Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. 2013.
5.
Perović G. Measurement error theory - Monograph 3. 2015.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.