Home Archive Editorial board News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 193 - 204
Review paper
Architecture Editor: Maja Ilić
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 7
PDF Downloads: 6
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Review paper Architecture Editor: Maja Ilić

AUTOTELICITY AS A CAPACITY OF ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT: ARCHITECTURE OF CREATIVITY IN CHILDREN'S SPACES

By
Diana Stupar ,
Diana Stupar

University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Maja Milić Aleksić ,
Maja Milić Aleksić
Contact Maja Milić Aleksić

University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ivan Živanović
Ivan Živanović
Contact Ivan Živanović

HRTB Arkitekter, Banja luka, Norway

Abstract

This paper explores the intricate relationship between architecture and creativity, with a particular emphasis on the concept of autotelicity. Autotelicity, defined as a state where an individual fully immerses themselves in an activity within a spatial context, is examined as a crucial element in the creative process and appreciation of architecture. The investigation revolves around how autotelicity can form the basis for architectural concepts and how architecture, in turn, can encourage user creativity through this lens. Through case studies of children's spaces, this research aims to illuminate these concepts and provide fresh insights into how architecture influences our spatial perception while fostering creative thought and behavior. The emphasis on autotelicity underscores architecture's potential to inspire creativity and enjoyment in everyday spatial use.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.