Home Archiveaaa News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 611 - 620
Review paper
Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 118
PDF Downloads: 97
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Review paper Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević

APPLICATION OF CLOSE-RANGE UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY IN THE DETECTION OF CRACKS ON FACADE

By
Nikola Santrač Orcid logo ,
Nikola Santrač
Contact Nikola Santrač

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Mehmed Batilović Orcid logo ,
Mehmed Batilović

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Marko Marković Orcid logo ,
Marko Marković

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Miro Govedarica Orcid logo ,
Miro Govedarica

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Pavel Benka Orcid logo
Pavel Benka

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstract

The photogrammetric survey of buildings is a beneficial process to obtain accurate 3D data for facade inspection. It allows more straightforward monitoring of the state of the facade over time. An orthomosaic with an average ground sampling distance of 2.1 mm is created using close-range unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. Ground control points, determined with millimeter accuracy from the geodetic network, were used for georeferencing. Resulting in an average ground control points residual of 1.6 mm. Based on the created orthomosaic, visual detection of cracks in the facade was performed. Also, an orthomosaic created with this accuracy can be a basis for automatic tools for detecting cracks on the facade.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.