Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 13, 2018
Pages: 664 - 678
Preliminary report/Short communication
Architecture
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 450
PDF Downloads: 477
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.12.2017. Preliminary report/Short communication Architecture

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ACCORDING TO DOCUMENT FEMA 310

By
Marina Latinović ,
Marina Latinović
Žarko Lazić ,
Žarko Lazić

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Gordana Broćeta Orcid logo
Gordana Broćeta

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In this paper, the principle of application of the FEMA310 document for seismic evaluation of existing buildings is briefly illustrated, for any building type, and examples of evaluation are given for the first and second tier of evaluation process, for two types of masonry structures. The application of this document at tier one and tier two of the evaluation process is a conservative, simplified way of determining seismic resistance, based on many experiential data and including the most important parameters of buildings that can affect seismic resistance. Instructions given by FEMA310 are easy to apply, but are adapted to US standards. Two examples for evaluation of masonry buildings on first and second tier of evaluation are given, for masonry buildings with rigid and flexible diaphragmas.

References

[1]
F.E.M.A., *Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings*, vol. 310. 1998.
[2]
D. Ančić, P. Fajfar, B. Petrović, A. Szavits-Nossa, and M. Tomažević, *Zemljotresno inženjerstvo – visokogradnja*. 1990.
[3]
M. Aćić and G. Ćirović, “The role and the significance of construction in reduction of seismic risk,” 2009.
[4]
M. Tomažević, “Earthquake resistant design of masonry buildings: 40 years after the Banja Luka earthquake,” 2009.
[5]
D. Trkulja, “Banjalučki zemljotresi,” 2009.
[6]
M. Herak and D. Herak, “Analyses of seismicity as input for earthquake hazard studies in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 2009.
[7]
E. Zlatanović, G. Broćeta, and N. Popović-Miletić, “Numerical modelling in seismic analysis of tunnels regarding soil–structure interaction,” *Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering*, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 251–267, 2013.
[8]
Ž. Lazić, Z. Koneski, and J. Stanojević, “Accidental torsion in symmetrical structures,” 2005.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.