Low-rise, high-density housing (further LRHD housing) represents an alternative model for solving contemporary housing issues in urban areas. However this specific typological form is not recognized in local urban planning and legislative frameworks. The aim of this research is to explore the possibilities for development of LRHD housing within local frameworks through the assessment of urban parameters potentially achievable through the application of the pilot Mix-Mesh concept for LRHD housing and their comparative analysis with values defined by local planning regulations.
References
1.
Lj. Vasilevska MR. Low/rise high density housing – recommendation and key principles in the process of urban and architectural design. In: Thematic Proceedings: Innovation as a Function of Engineering Development – IDE 2011, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2011. p. 259-274,.
2.
Milanović D, Vasilevska L. Influence of private open spaces on the quality of living in low-rise high density housing, Facta Universitatis – Series. Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2018;16(2):293-305,.
3.
Peng Du AW, Ditchman N, Stephens B. Life Satisfaction of Downtown High-Rise vs.Suburban Low-Rise Living: A Chicago Case Study. Sustainability. 2017;9(6):1052,.
4.
Arrigone JL. Urban Densification Through Low-rise/high-density Housing, Development Bank of Southern Africa, Centre for Policy. Information and Evaluation. 1995;
5.
Theisler KK. Low-rise, high-density housing, as a way of sustainability in Hungary. Open house international. 2015;40(3):44-51,.
6.
Nzimande NP, Morris-Kolawole F. Does Size Really Matter for the Place Attachment of High-Rise and Low-Rise Housing Estates? A Budapest Case Study. Sustainability. 2024;16(3):1–17.
7.
Bramley G, Power S. Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2009;36:30-48,.
8.
Saggio A, Sauer L. The Architect of Low-rise High-density Housing, Department of Architecture and Urban Design. 2014.
9.
Marinković A. Održivi model organizacije otvorenih prostora u stambenim područjima niske spratnosti-velike gustine, doktorska disertacija. 2018.
10.
Sano S, Filipović I, Radović D. Public-private interaction in low-rise, high-density Tokyo: a morphological and functional study of contemporary residential row-houses. The Journal of Public Space. 2020;5:0 2,.
11.
Stoiljković B. Projektovnje stambenih zgrada – Porodično stanovanje. 2020.
12.
Low Rise Housing Diversity Design Guide for Development Applications, The Government of New South Wales. Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. 2020;
13.
Stoiljković B, Grozdanović NP, Petrović V. Stanovi sa karakteristikama kuća: od utopije do realnosti. Zbornik radova Građevinsko-arhitektonskog fakulteta. 2019;34:42-51,.
14.
Stoiljković B, Grozdanović NP, Petrović V. Main features of house-like apartments, Facta universitatis. Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2020;18(1):33-47,.
15.
Grozdanović NP, Stoiljković B, Krstić H. Rethinking the Private Open Space Of Ground Floor Units In Multi. In: Family Housing Developments In the City Of Nis, Serbia, Conference Proceedings of IV International Conference on Urban Planning – ICUP 2022. 2022. p. 95-102,.
16.
Generalni urbanistički plan Niša 2010-2025, Skupština grada Niša.
17.
Priručnik za planiranje stambenih naselja u Crnoj Gori, Ministarstvo održivog razvoja i turizma Crne Gore, LAMP (Projekat zemljišne administracije i upravljanja. The World Bank. 2015;
