Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 372 - 385
Research paper
Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 222
PDF Downloads: 124
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Research paper Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović

MODELING OF POROUS DRY MATERIALS USING RHEOLOGICALDYNAMICAL ANALOGY

By
Dragan Milašinović Orcid logo ,
Dragan Milašinović

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Nataša Mrđa Bošnjak Orcid logo
Nataša Mrđa Bošnjak
Contact Nataša Mrđa Bošnjak

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

A theoretical model for porous viscoelastoplastic (VEP) materials under dry conditions is examined based on the principles of mass and energy conservation using rheological-dynamical analogy (RDA). The model provides the expressions for the creep coefficient, Poisson's ratio, modulus of elasticity, damage variable and strength in the function of porosity and/or void volume fraction (VVF). Compared with numerous versions of acoustic emission monitoring developed to analyze the behavior of the total wave propagation in inhomogeneous media with density variation, the RDA model is found to be comprehensive in interpretation and consistent with physical understanding. The reliability of the proposed model is confirmed by the comparison of numerical results with experimental ones on hardened concrete and rocks.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.