Home Archiveaaa News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 685 - 699
Review paper
Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 111
PDF Downloads: 64
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Review paper Geodesy Editor: Gordana Jakovljević

VALIDATION OF THE NEQUICK AND IRI MODELS BASED ON DATA FROM IONOSONDES

By
Slavica Ilijević ,
Slavica Ilijević
Contact Slavica Ilijević

Faculty of Civil Engineering Subotica, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

Sanja Grekulović Orcid logo ,
Sanja Grekulović

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Miljana Todorović Drakul
Miljana Todorović Drakul

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

This study compares the NeQuick and IRI ionospheric models using data from ionosondes as reference. Validation based on data obtained by direct measurement using ionosondes helps to refine empirical models and improves their reliability. In this way, it is possible to identify the differences and limitations of the model and contribute to its improvement. As the NeQuick and IRI models provide tools for the study of ionospheric variability and forecasts of the ionospheric TEC coefficient, their versions are constantly being improved and need to be validated accordingly. Therefore, this research is based on the comparison of the TEC coefficient for the validation of two different ionosphere models based on data from three different regions of Europe.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.