Home Archiveaaa News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 337 - 350
Research paper
Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 176
PDF Downloads: 82
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Research paper Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović

A NOTE ON BEAM-TO-BEAM CONTACT DYNAMICS

By
Aleksandar Borković ,
Aleksandar Borković

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Miloš Jočković ,
Miloš Jočković
Contact Miloš Jočković

Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Dijana Tatar ,
Dijana Tatar

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Snježana Milovanović
Snježana Milovanović

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Two approaches for beam-to-beam contact modeling are considered in the paper. The first is the classic continuum approach with point-to-point contact discretization. The other is the coarsegrained approach where the physical intermolecular fields are applied for the modeling of interaction of continuous bodies. To describe the contact, the repulsive steric potential is utilized here. The advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are discussed, and the results are compared with those obtained in Abaqus. An involved computational simulation of multiple collisions between elastic beams is considered as a numerical example.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.